As an AMD Elite APAC partner, Jubilant Tech builds most modern server deployments on AMD EPYC. This 2026 guide explains why EPYC leads for today’s workloads, where Intel Xeon still makes sense, and how to choose with confidence.

Both AMD and Intel make excellent server processors, but for the majority of current data-centre workloads across Asia-Pacific, AMD EPYC has become our recommended platform. Here’s the workload-first reasoning behind that, kept honest about where Xeon remains the better call.

Why we build on AMD EPYC

Core density that scales

EPYC’s strength is high core count per socket. For dense virtualisation, containerised microservices, HPC, and parallel analytics, more cores per socket means more work consolidated onto fewer servers — which cascades into less rack space, lower power draw, and reduced per-server licensing. If your workload scales with threads, this is often the single biggest lever on both performance and cost.

Performance per watt and lower TCO

Power and cooling are major operating costs in APAC, where energy prices and ambient temperatures vary widely. EPYC’s strong performance-per-watt, combined with server consolidation, drives down total cost of ownership over the life of the deployment — not just the hardware line item. When you model TCO across power, cooling, rack, and licensing, dense EPYC configurations frequently come out ahead.

Memory bandwidth and abundant I/O

Modern data-heavy and AI workloads are often bottlenecked by memory and I/O rather than raw cores. EPYC platforms are well known for generous memory channels and high PCIe lane counts, which suit NVMe-dense storage and GPU-accelerated servers — an increasingly common requirement as teams build out AI infrastructure.

One platform, genuine stock, fast supply

As an AMD Elite APAC partner, Jubilant Tech supplies genuine AMD EPYC platforms — from Dell, HPE, Lenovo, Supermicro, ASRock Rack, Gigabyte, and Tyan — with full OEM warranty, a 48-hour quote response, and delivery across 14 APAC countries. That combination of authorised stock and regional speed removes the two biggest bottlenecks in the buying cycle.

Where Intel Xeon still fits

EPYC isn’t the automatic answer for every case, and we’ll say so plainly. Intel Xeon can be the better choice where per-core performance is the priority, where specific ISV software is optimised or licensed for Xeon, or where an existing Intel-tuned stack or particular accelerator is in play. In those situations we supply Xeon systems too — the goal is the right platform for your workload, not a one-size-fits-all answer.

Our recommendation for APAC deployments

• Default to AMD EPYC for virtualisation, cloud, HPC, analytics, and AI infrastructure — anywhere core density, performance-per-watt, and I/O dominate.
• Consider Intel Xeon for per-core-sensitive or Xeon-optimised software, or an established Intel stack.
• Model TCO both ways — but for most modern, parallel workloads, dense EPYC configurations win on total cost.

Whichever way your workload points, regional availability and genuine, warrantied stock matter as much as the silicon. That’s where an AMD Elite APAC partner with 14-country coverage makes the difference.

Frequently asked questions